Vaccines, obviously. Proper testing and fast response to positive tests. Doctor-prescribed prophylactics. Immunocompromised in particular need a diverse range of prophylactics.
What’s the aim of the entire Covid vaccine (and other preventatives) program?
Vaccination is a way to get some immunity without having to contract the virus (which is risky) to get natural immunity.
Proper testing shows up individual immunity-antibodies-resistance to SARS-CoV2. Testing is non-discriminatory.
Anything less than proper testing is increasing risk to public health, perpetuating the virus, potentially contributing to SARS-CoV2 becoming endemic.
“JCVI says there is insufficient evidence to support giving jabs to all 12- to 15-year-olds” but was updated a few hours later to Ministers could defy JCVI and go ahead with Covid jabs for all 12- to 15-year-olds with sub-head “Official vaccine advisers consider margin of benefit too small to support vaccination of entire age group.”
US as of 11th December 2020:
US, Natural infection, Feb 2020 to May 2021:
CDC still recommends a full vaccination dose for all the immune response from vaccination is more predictable antibody responses after infection vary widely by individual. Peter Marks, Food and Drug Administration’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research: “We do know that the immunity after vaccination is better than the immunity after natural infection generally the immunity after natural infection tends to wane after about 90 days”
Stakeholder Call – Myocarditis and Pericarditis Updates (29-Jun-2021)
It appears from the literature that natural infection provides immunity, but that immunity is seemingly not as strong and may not be as long lasting as that provided by the vaccine UK covid pass guidelines:
Protection from prior SARS-CoV-2 infection:
Ministry of Health during summer surge:
Dvir Aran, biomedical data, Technion – Israel Institute of Technology: “These numbers look very low. The data suggest that the recovered have better protection than people who were vaccinated.”
Systemic side-effects were more common in people previously infected >>
Large UK study of systemic/vaccine side effects after natural infection:
Public health strategy versus individualised medicine ideally should blood test every individual, give every individual antibody test, B-cell and T cell test to give an “immunity” score to see if booster is needed
Aspirating ensures vaccination goes intramuscular, not intravenous. Intravenous is dangerous. Intravenous doesn’t happen often but it is more common in younger people. It could be the reason for the myocarditis, thrombosis and other extreme adverse reactions to the mRNA vaccines in particular.
Why is AstraZeneca vaccine not available in the US, even after its proven safe, used in comparable countries with better Coronavirus outcomes?
Why so little attention given – especially from Summer 2021 – to data showing the ad-vector vaccine antibody response is lasting considerably longer than the Pfizer/Moderna mRNA shots?
Is the rapid loss of Covid antibody/immunity from mRNA vaccines contributing to the persistent and otherwise inexplicable low fidelity testing standards?
Antiviral medication Ivermectin was invented in Japan and mass-produced by Merck. It is now out of patent, cheap and available worldwide. Merck is developing Molnupiravir (MK-4482) as a therapeutic to treat COVID-19 infections. It would be an antiviral, like Ivermectin, but patented and therefore potentially worth tens of billions profit versus Ivermectin which is worth nada. Molnupiravir is in Phase 3 trials. Merck received a base award amount of $1.2 billion on 7-Jun-2021 from the Federal Government (1.7 million doses).
Not surprisingly, the two antivirals have certain similarities. With neither showing any serious adverse side effects. “Molnupiravir is a pro-drug of the novel active antiviral nucleoside analogue … It’s a broad spectrum antiviral agent. … Ivermectin is a broad-spectrum, anti-parasitic, antibiotic and which has demonstrated broad-spectrum antiviral activity.”
Merck had the patent on Ivermectin until 1996. So it is not a coincidence that they have developed this very expensive drug, Molnupiravir, funded by the US taxpayer and which is similar. It follows, then, why there is so much disparagement of Ivermectin. If widely accepted, it could rain on Merck’s parade and greatly embarrass BARDA.
What I cannot grasp is that for the 10 months when the vaccines were being developed, certain caring, critical care physicians sought out existing drugs and developed protocols. These have been changed multiple times and are currently undergoing more changes to address the variants issue. The FLCCC Alliance recommends the use Ivermectin as part of more expansive protocols which they have developed for the prophylaxis and treatment of COVID-19 at all stages by both the vaxxed and the un-vaxxed. These physicians should be lauded, not abused.
Both Molnupiravir and Ivermectin have demonstrable adjunctive chemoprophylaxis but with no profit from generic Ivermectin, funding from Merck is directed to produce FDA-simpatico studies demonstrating Molnupiravir’s efficacy.
Young people recover fast.
Young males risk greater from mRNA vaccination than from Covid-19.
Should young people be forced to take the individual risk for the sake of older, vulnerable members of the public?
Can the end justify the means when it come to public health, i.e. saving the most lives versus respecting individual freedom (to be wrong)?
Natural infection versus vaccination: Differences in COVID antibody responses emerge (24-Aug-2021) @ Study Analysis on rockefeller.edu website.
The Race to Understand Post–COVID-19 Conditions (31-Aug-2021) @ ACP Journal Link on acpjournals.org website.
A Novel Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vector with Low Human Seroprevalence: Improved Systems for Vector Derivation and Comparative Immunogenicity (13-Jul-2012) @ ARTICLE on journals.plos.org website.
Ad26 vector-based COVID-19 vaccine encoding a prefusion-stabilized SARS-CoV-2 Spike Immunogen: induces potent humoral and cellular immune responses (28-Sept-2020) @ NATURE ARTICLE on nature.com website. See interesting ethics declaration at the end of the article.
Adenoviral vectors are the new COVID-19 vaccine front-runners: Can they overcome their checkered past? (12-May-2020) @ ACS HYPE ARTICLE on cen.acs.org website.
Chimpanzee adenoviral vectors as vaccines for outbreak pathogens (30-Oct-2017) @ Peer-Reviewed Article on nih.gov repository.
Vaccines based on replication incompetent Ad26 viral vectors: Standardized template with key considerations for a risk/benefit assessment (18-Sept-2020) @ STUDY RESULTS on sciencedirect.com website.
News – Communicating the potential benefits and harms of the Astra-Zeneca COVID-19 vaccine (7-Apr-2021) @ Winton Centre Summary on University of Cambridge website.
Review of COVID-19 vaccine subtypes, efficacy and geographical distributions (8-May-2021) @ PRE-PUBLISH ARTICLE on BMJ (British Medical Journal) website.
Origins of COVID-19: Fauci’s $191 Billion Bio-Weaponization of Viruses Against Humanity (21-Jun-2021) on David DeGraw substack page.
Bacterial Pneumonia Caused Most Deaths in 1918 Influenza Pandemic (19-Aug-2008) on nih.gov website.
IDSA says US antiviral supply for flu falls far short (17-Jun-2005) on the University of Minnesota website.
Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread (22-Aug-2005) on nih.gov website.
Potential therapeutic agents to COVID-19: An update review on antiviral therapy, immunotherapy, and cell therapy (16-Mar-2021) on nih.gov website.
Operation Choke Point an Obama era squeeze on small business access to money, payment processing, etc.
Operation Choke Point reveals true injustices of Obama’s Justice Department (7-Nov-2018) on The Hill online blog site.
Probe of Secret Vaccine Talks Finds ‘Access for All Was Never a Priority’ (24-Sept-2021) on commondreams.org website.
Biohacker’ Who Injected Himself With DIY Herpes Treatment Found Dead (5-May-2018) on slashdot.org and livescience.com websites.
Seguro Popular: Health Coverage For All in Mexico (26-Feb-2015) on the World Bank website.
August 2021 report on Ivermectin In Africa Blocking COVID-19 on paulcraigroberts.org blog website. Poorer countries are denied access to the vaccines produced in rich nations. Many must tackle Coronavirus using prophylactics and treatment protocols repurposing existing methods like antivirals.
What to know about the Coronavirus and Blood Donation by American Red Cross (Aug-2021) @ Red Cross Website Link.
“In most cases, there is no deferral time for individuals who received a COVID-19 vaccine as long as they are symptom free and feeling well at the time of donation. There is no deferral time for eligible blood donors who are vaccinated with an inactivated or RNA based COVID-19 vaccine manufactured by AstraZeneca, Janssen/J&J, Moderna, Novavax, or Pfizer.”
Profit Squeeze and Cost Distribution For and Against Vaccine Hesitant and Covid-19 ‘Freeloaders’ – Delta’s Extra $200 Monthly Healthcare Surcharge To Unvaccinated Airline Workers May Have Serious Unintended Consequences (28-Aug-2021) @ ARTICLE on the pro-corporate forbes.com website.
Cash and the city: COVID-19 digital social response in Kinshasa, DRC (8-Sept-2021) @ STUDY LINK on Brookings Institute website.
Politicization of Pandemic Measures: Dr Tess Lawrie and Ivermectin on the desertreview.com website.
Cost-sharing waivers and premium relief by private plans in response to COVID-19 in the Early Pandemic (19-Nov-2020) @ SUMMARY ARTICLE on the healthsystemtracker.org website.
Will My Health Insurance Cover a COVID-19 Vaccine? (29-Aug-2021) @ ARTICLE on the verywellhealth.com website.
CDC data shows very very low risk from Coronavirus vaccines (mRNA or ad-vector) though the chance of serious side effects increases – separate to co-morbidities – for much younger patients, especially males under 21. CDC site numbers give between 5000-1 and 20000-1 serious myocarditis/pericarditis risk for mRNA (Pfizer/Moderna) vaccines, especially after second dose. This risk is far higher than the risk of serious Covid-19, for that age/gender group. Is it OK to put young lives at greater risk for the sake of older lives potentially facing greater risk, e.g. coronavirus caught by grandkids passed on to grandparents?
Myocarditis and Pericarditis Following Vaccination with COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines in Ontario: December 13, 2020 to August 7, 2021 @ Canada Study of 100 Youths Hospitalized after mRNA Vaccination publichealthontario.ca website link.
“Vioxx” is the name is a smear campaign playbook used by Merck Pharmaceuticals to campaign against its own competing drug—the FDA-approved, Nobel prize-winning antiviral Ivermectin, which is generic, cheap and globally available with very little scope for significant profit. See Merck’s deadly Vioxx playbook redux (7-Sept-2021) @ ARTICLE on TrialSiteNews website documenting corporate malfeasance.
Anti-cancer drug derived from fungus shows promise in clinical trials article from the Oxford University website.
The Days of Full Covid-19 Coverage Are Over (20-Sept-2021) @ Reddit Thread from /r/Coronavirus subreddit.
3D Printed Vaccine Patch Offers Vaccination Without a Shot (24-Sept-2021) @ University of NC announcement in medicalxpress.com website article.
Pfizer CEO rallies staff to fight Democrats’ drug price negotiation (22-Sept-2021) @ ARTICLE on politico.com website.
Covax Misses its 2021 Delivery Target – What’s Gone Wrong in the Fight Against Vaccine Nationalism? (18-Seot-2021) @ ARTICLE overview on nakedcapitalism.com website.
The Ride of the Biosecurity State – with Whitney Webb on Rokfin (20-Sept-2021) @ ROKFIN VIDEO on Whitney Webb’s Rokfin channel.
“In vivo evidence that inadvertent intravenous injection of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines may induce myopericarditis. Brief withdrawal of syringe plunger to exclude blood aspiration may be one possible way to reduce such risk. Both Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna have clearly stated that their vaccines should only be given via IM route. CDC/UK/WHO guidelines do not instruct this necessary technique.”
Development of mRNA technology has been in progress for over 20 years, primarily with a view to opening a new deliver mechanism and drug potential for cancer treatments. Various science hurdles had to be overcome; and NIH / DARPA funding drove the research in the US. UK and German government funding equivalents, both importing the technology once the patented messenger RNA delivered in lipid shell mechanism was patented by US Govt. NIH licensed the mRNA tech to public/private companies like BioNtech, Moderna, Cellscript and others.
Gain-of-function research has a long controversial history and by the time Obama administration signed off on American labs not doing it, EU had also banned it. China has no such restrictions on risky leading edge medical research.
While mRNA was originally found to be viable for in vivo gene transfer in the early 1990’s, the development of mRNA vaccines was initiated much later due to the inherent instability of mRNA compared to DNA. The efficacy of mRNA vaccines can be increased by several factors, such as ensuring mRNA purity, adding 5’ Kozak and cap sequences, 3’ poly-A sequences and modified nucleosides to increase mRNA stability and decrease detection by the receptors of innate immune cells, codon optimization, introduction by intramuscular, and intradermal injection to reduce RNA degradation, and by generating thermostable mRNA. Methods to encapsulate RNA have also been explored to increase the stability and immunogenicity of RNA vaccines, as has been used with exosome encapsulated RNA and RNA-transfected dendritic cells. When fully optimized, RNA vaccines may have an immunogenic advantage over DNA vaccines due to the presence of multiple cellular pathways that activate innate immunity in response to foreign RNA such as the toll-like receptors (TLRs) and RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs).
CCP and Chinese military scientists were brought on board. SARS had hit China. The CCP had been working at research already and was keen to benefit from importing state-of-the-art tech + science. Wuhan Institute of Virology ramped up world leading gain-of-function research and other key internationally sanctioned biological virus science.
Early 2020. World Health Organisation declares pandemic. Coronavirus goes global. China shares viral genetic codes. Chinese scientists from the Wuhan lab register early Covid-19 vaccine patents along with Moderna and BioNtech-Pfizer.
Wet market narrative is inserted. China, WHO, CDC, US Govt and others are in lockstep with an official consensus: accidental coronavirus mutation from animals to humans went pandemic, no lab leak, lockdowns across the world to minimize infections, mass media husband public demand for vaccine ASAP.
Based on data reported by the manufacturer for Pfzier/BioNTech vaccine BNT162b2, this critical appraisal shows: relative risk reduction, 95.1%; 95% CI, 90.0% to 97.6%; p = 0.016; absolute risk reduction, 0.7%; 95% CI, 0.59% to 0.83%; p < 0.000. For the Moderna vaccine mRNA-1273, the appraisal shows: relative risk reduction, 94.1%; 95% CI, 89.1% to 96.8%; p = 0.004; absolute risk reduction, 1.1%; 95% CI, 0.97% to 1.32%; p < 0.000. Unreported absolute risk reduction measures of 0.7% and 1.1% for the Pfzier/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, respectively, are very much lower than the reported relative risk reduction measures. Reporting absolute risk reduction measures is essential to prevent outcome reporting bias in evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine efficacy.
Relative risk reduction and absolute risk reduction measures in the evaluation of clinical trial data are poorly understood by health professionals and the public. The absence of reported absolute risk reduction in COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials can lead to outcome reporting bias that affects the interpretation of vaccine efficacy. What's more, trial data is limited by short time period reporting that don't take into account increase or decrease in efficacy outside the short window of back to back testing.
Much media propagation of the NIH having concluded "there's currently insufficient data to recommend ivermectin for the treatment of COVID" i.e. don't use it, don't explore it. In fact, NIH current status on Ivermectin is there is not enough data to recommend or to discourage its use. NIH recommendation prior to December 2020 was to discourage Ivermectin usage. The change itself is significant and would usually be accompanied by a rush of funds to study its antiviral efficacy. No such funding has been forthcoming.
Interestingly, two other COVID modalities have exactly the same recommend/discourage status. That would be remdesevir and outpatient monoclonal antibodies. EXACTLY the same status on both of these as ivermectin currently. The NIH states there is not enough evidence to recommend or to discourage the use of either of these. And yet we continue right on with both the others without a blink of an eye.
A little maths –
Eventually, if things keeps looking, smelling and tasting like shit then we have to conclude it is shit.
Moderna (m----RNA) in Cambridge MA start-up launched to monetize public-private partnership. Pfizer exclusive partnership with German funded BioNTech. AstraZeneca licenses Oxford University developed vaccine for Coronavirus with a zero-profit agreement.
Vaccine distribution is mostly under the control of the US (mRNA), the UK and India (AstraZeneca), with Russia and China rolling out its own vaccines using less advanced industrial scale technology. US Govt controls Pfizer/BioNtech and Moderna patents. UK Govt and UK/Swedish institutions probably control AstraZeneca patents. EU role is significant in production, probably less relevant in patent control.
India is a major vaccine producer but its nationalist government has expelled the vaccine maker CEOs, hoarding stock for its own people; whose need is great.
UK and US are the only autonomous advanced vaccine ecosystems. Both have horded homeland stock. US plays benevolent provider with one hand, price gouging hostage nations with the other.
Trillions of dollars are at stake, for corporate and treasury revenue, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom/European Union. This will ensure American govt and its corporate clients will continue to exert their tight hold on the Coronavirus narrative.
Expect censorship to continue, subjects diversifying according to government priority as directed by vaccine makers and political expedience. Big tech regulation is a stick to beat platforms into submission, taxation a clear and present penalty for forcing corporations or billionaire CEOs to play ball.
Expect transgressions that risk profit or power to be punished with increasing force. Too much money and too many powerful people have staked their future on the current Coronavirus Political-Industrial complex. Expect genuine alternate prevention and treatment to be marginalized. Will there be a paradigm shift? Look for testing standards that never coalesce and vaccine approval bias that continue to choose profit over lives e.g. American FDA not letting no-profit AstraZeneca ad-vector into the US market.
Expect shifting standards in the media shilling for vaccine and vaccine mandates as efficacy data becomes less falsifiable real-world but maximum profit will inform the narrative e.g. if vax doesn't protect fully, look for propaganda about extra/regular shots, excuses like "the virus mutated" etc.
The Challenge of National Healthcare as President Truman takes on the American Medical Association in the aftermath of World War II.
Anonymous "Conspiracy" Dossier on Coronavirus SARS-COV2, Peter Daszak Wuhan Virology, Fauci, the NIH/DARPA/Chinese CP Research Timelines
Underinsurance has been a barrier to vaccination among children. Information on vaccination among adults ≥18 years by insurance status is limited. Purpose To assess vaccination coverage among adults ≥18 years in the United States in 2012 by health insurance status and access to care characteristics.
Ecohealth Alliance Inc (Peter Daszak) ongoing provision of research grant payments for Bat Coronavirus Gain of Function work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology
Small repository of documents and links relating to the Oxford University SARS-CoV2 vaccine and Bill Gates Foundation early negotiations
Almost 50 million people (16%) population of the United States, live in rural areas, mainly low-to-moderate-income individuals. 65% of uninsured in rural areas live in States without ACA coverage
The 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act), signed into law on December 13, 2016, is designed to help accelerate medical product development and bring new innovations and advances to patients who need them faster and more efficiently. Ahem
Studying the data about leading casues of death in metro and nonmetro areas of the United States 1999 and 2014 inclusive. Higher rates of death in nonmetropolitan areas (often referred to as rural areas) compared with metropolitan areas have been described
Prefusion Coronavirus Spike Proteins NIH document - exemplar of going through the motions of appropriating the govt-funded mRNA vaccine technology and corollary patents, to enrich private business interests
National Institutes of Health (NIH) today lifted a 3-year moratorium on funding gain-of-function (GOF) research on potential pandemic viruses such as avian flu, bat coronavirus, SARS, and MERS, opening the door for gain-of-function research to resume
NIH has played a critical role in coronavirus research for decades. Federal scientists have helped fund, design, patent and test mRNA-1273 and others; vaccine candidates developed through Moderna and licensed to BioNTech (Germany) partnered with Pfizer Inc.
Trusted News Initiative (TNI) brought to bear on news and internet media outlets, directed by government, ostensibly to combat so-called disinformation
Scientists around the world are working to produce vaccines that can stop COVID-19. Since the emergence of this novel coronavirus in Dec 2019, 20 vaccines have started to be rolled out in countries worldwide.